Mark Reinhold’s proposal for Java closures

I believe this proposal, although incomplete, to be much more acceptable to the current Java community than existing BGGA or FCM.

Most proposals state that it’s not the syntax that matters, it’s the semantics. While this is undoubtedly true, syntax is the first thing a programmer will see and judge the feature by. If the syntax isn’t self-explanatory enough, it will be a cause of rejection, and the feature will not be used as it could have been. So I do believe syntax is a key point of the future Java closures feature, and in this respect I tend to favor Mak Rheinhold’s proposal or the FCM proposal rather than BGGA.

Mark Rheinhold’s proposal

Project Lambda

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.